<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Tinsology &#187; script</title> <atom:link href="http://tinsology.net/tag/script/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tinsology.net</link> <description>Searching for the Right Questions</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>Scripting Vs. Programming</title><link>http://tinsology.net/2009/06/scripting-vs-programming/</link> <comments>http://tinsology.net/2009/06/scripting-vs-programming/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:59:06 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tinsley</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[script]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://tinsology.net/?p=761</guid> <description><![CDATA[Occasionally I'll see someone make a point of distinguishing coding in a particular language as scripting as opposed to programming. Often times the distinction is arbitrary. I've seen justifications for this distinction ranging from scripting languages not being as strict as programming languages, to scripting languages not being turing complete. Web languages in particular (HTML, javascript, PHP, etc) seem to have the stigma of being scripting languages. To this day <a
href="http://tinsology.net/2009/06/scripting-vs-programming/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://tinsology.net/2009/06/scripting-vs-programming/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
