<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
> <channel><title>Tinsology &#187; optimizing</title> <atom:link href="http://tinsology.net/tag/optimizing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://tinsology.net</link> <description>Searching for the Right Questions</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:57:44 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Over Optimizing</title><link>http://tinsology.net/2009/05/over-optimizing/</link> <comments>http://tinsology.net/2009/05/over-optimizing/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:45:04 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Tinsley</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category> <category><![CDATA[optimizing]]></category> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://tinsology.net/?p=667</guid> <description><![CDATA[The word optimal has become a buzz word that gets tossed around too easily. Something a professor of mine pointed out a few weeks ago: By definition, optimal is something that isn't realistic to achieve in the context of programming or software engineering. If something is optimal, there is no room for improvement, which is never the case. Some people may be irritated by the misuse of this word, but <a
href="http://tinsology.net/2009/05/over-optimizing/">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <wfw:commentRss>http://tinsology.net/2009/05/over-optimizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
